The Worst People in America: Jonathan Franzen

O pompous face of the White Male Author,
Handsome enough, but not too handsome,
Demon of a VIDA nightmare.

If you name your fake town St. Jude
You cannot then explain the reference:
It insults your reader’s intelligence.

Wherefore this notion that you are the best?
Even in your White Male cohort, you pale to kings.
Give me my Eugenides! My virgin suicide!

There you are on the cover of TIME.
“The Great American Novelist,” it proclaims.
Hitler also graced that cover. Stalin, too.

A writer ignorant of Facebook and Twitter
Is not equipped to write on How We Live Now.
AMERICA: My country t’isn’t of thee.

PURITY, the new one. Orwellian title, no?
You have come to refine American letters,
To cast out all contaminants.

But impurity is what makes literature, sir.
Take your binoculars and go away.
Your books, like your passions, are for the birds.

360_wfranzen_0823

About Billy The Poet

J. Edgar Nation must die.
This entry was posted in Worst People in America and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Worst People in America: Jonathan Franzen

  1. “It’s hard to cite facts or create an argument in 140 characters,” said Jonathan Franzen, in 63 characters.

    • Ted Burke says:

      Franzen is correct on the Twitter remark. Facts have history and history that is of any use and consequence to the reader seeking a better perspective on matters cannot be reduced to the bumper sticker motif. For Billy the Poet, there is no real telling what he’s going on about ; the best guess is that this a “hot take”, an opinion composed of desperation and hot air . “There you are on the cover of TIME./“The Great American Novelist,” it proclaims./Hitler also graced that cover. Stalin, too.” Jesus, Billy, you go for the Hitler-Stalin card so quickly in your constipated effort to succinctly damn Franzen, a device that tips off a reader that you were unprepared to create a convincing damnation of the novelist. This false equivalence is a stale and cliche and cheap. A poet is supposed to reanimate old animosities with fresh and original invective; nothing of the sort happened here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *